Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Gluten-free: food fad or alternative remedy? - Health Nutrition and ...

It sounds like an unfolding epidemic: A decade ago, virtually no one in the U.S. seemed to have a problem eating gluten in bread and other foods. Now, millions do.

Gluten-free products are flying off grocery shelves, and restaurants are boasting of meals with no gluten. Celebrities on TV talk shows chat about the digestive discomfort they blame on the wheat protein they now shun. Some churches even offer gluten-free Communion wafers.

?I don?t know whether there?s more people getting this or that more people are noticing? they have a problem, said the Rev. Richard Allen, pastor at Mamaroneck United Methodist Church, north of New York City.

Or is it just another food fad?

Faddishness is a big part of it. Americans will spend an estimated $7 billion this year on foods labeled gluten-free, according to the market research firm Mintel. But the best estimates are that more than half the consumers buying these products ? perhaps way more than half ? don?t have any clear-cut reaction to gluten.

They buy gluten-free because they think it will help them lose weight, or because they seem to feel better, or because they mistakenly believe they are sensitive to gluten.

?We have a lot of self-diagnosing going on out there,? said Melissa Abbott, who tracks the gluten-free market for the Hartman Group, a Seattle-area market research organization.

Fads aside, research suggests more people are truly getting sick from the gluten found in wheat, rye and barley, but the reasons aren?t clear.

In the most serious cases, gluten triggers celiac disease. The condition causes abdominal pain, bloating and intermittent diarrhea. Those with the ailment don?t absorb nutrients well and can suffer weight loss, fatigue, rashes and other problems.

It was once considered extremely rare in the U.S. But about 20 years ago, a few scientists began exploring why celiac disease was less common here than in Europe and other countries. They concluded that it wasn?t less common here; it was just under-diagnosed.

More recently, a research team led by the Mayo Clinic?s Dr. Joseph Murray looked at blood samples taken from Americans in the 1950s and compared them with samples taken from people today, and determined it wasn?t just better diagnosis driving up the numbers. Celiac disease actually was increasing. Indeed, the research confirms estimates that about 1 percent of U.S. adults have it today, making it four times more common now than it was 50 years ago, Murray and his colleagues reported Tuesday in the American Journal of Gastroenterology.


    1. Reuters file


      Not so fun: Docs warn of rise in Zumba injuries


      Zumba may be a great way to ?party yourself into shape,? but according to a number of doctors, the wildly popular dance-fitness program may also be a good way to party yourself into pain.


    2. Weightlifter?s mole: All you never wanted to know


    3. Burned-out nurses spur more patient infections


    4. Devices don?t work to save kids in hot cars


    5. Red Cross: Blood donations lowest in 15 years

That translates to nearly 2 million Americans with celiac disease.

Celiac disease is different from an allergy to wheat, which affects a much smaller number of people, mostly children who outgrow it.

Scientists suggest that there may be more celiac disease today because people eat more processed wheat products like pastas and baked goods than in decades past, and those items use types of wheat that have a higher gluten content. Gluten helps dough rise and gives baked goods structure and texture.

Or it could be due to changes made to wheat, Murray said.

In the 1950s, scientists began cross-breeding wheat to make hardier, shorter and better-growing plants. It was the basis of the Green Revolution that boosted wheat harvests worldwide. Norman Borlaug, the U.S. plant scientist behind many of the innovations, won the Nobel Peace Prize for his work.

But the gluten in wheat may have somehow become even more troublesome for many people, Murray said.

That also may have contributed to what is now called ?gluten sensitivity.?

Doctors recently developed a definition for gluten sensitivity, but it?s an ambiguous one. It?s a label for people who suffer bloating and other celiac symptoms and seem to be helped by avoiding gluten, but don?t actually have celiac disease. Celiac disease is diagnosed with blood testing, genetic testing, or biopsies of the small intestine.

The case for gluten sensitivity was bolstered last year by a very small but often-cited Australian study. Volunteers who had symptoms were put on a gluten-free diet or a regular diet for six weeks, and they weren?t told which one. Those who didn?t eat gluten had fewer problems with bloating, tiredness and irregular bowel movements.

Clearly, ?there are patients who are gluten-sensitive,? said Dr. Sheila Crowe, a San Diego-based physician on the board of the American Gastroenterological Association.

What is hotly debated is how many people have the problem, she added. It?s impossible to know ?because the definition is nebulous,? she said.

One of the most widely cited estimates comes from Dr. Alessio Fasano, a University of Maryland researcher who led studies that changed the understanding of how common celiac disease is in the U.S.

Fasano believes 6 percent of U.S. adults have gluten sensitivity. But that?s based on a review of patients at his clinic ? hardly a representative sample of the general public.

Other estimates vary widely, he said. ?There?s a tremendous amount of confusion out there,? Fasano said.

Article source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48422462/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/

Source: http://health-nutrition-fitness.net/diet-and-nutrition/gluten-free-food-fad-or-alternative-remedy/

prince philip sugar cookie recipe sugar cookie recipe how the grinch stole christmas macaroni and cheese festivus festivus

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.